Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Kenyan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,929,877 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Kenyans within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.305. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Kenyans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 20.1 Kenyans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $91,684, a difference of 39.8%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $84,085, a difference of 32.6%), and per capita income ($56,709 compared to $42,808, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $60,514, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $50,815, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 40.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 36.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (14.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 31.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 44.0%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 35.2%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (66.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 16.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.35%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 45.5%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 42.4%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.20%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 38.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.7%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.8%).