Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Israeli Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Israeli
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Israelis

Good
Good
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,737
SOCIAL INDEX
64.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
145th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Israeli Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,189,635 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Israelis within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Israelis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Israelis.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Israeli Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Israeli Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $107,579, a difference of 19.1%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $52,335, a difference of 18.6%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $96,552, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.3%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $66,636, a difference of 7.4%), and per capita income ($56,709 compared to $52,596, a difference of 7.8%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Israeli Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongIsraeli
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Exceptional
$52,596
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Exceptional
$118,577
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Exceptional
$96,552
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Exceptional
$52,937
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Exceptional
$63,228
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Exceptional
$43,852
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Average
$52,335
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Exceptional
$107,579
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Exceptional
$114,186
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Exceptional
$66,636
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Israeli Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 33.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 29.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.8%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Israeli Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongIsraeli
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Fair
12.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Good
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Fair
11.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Average
13.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Excellent
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Excellent
15.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Average
12.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Israeli Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Israeli Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongIsraeli
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Tragic
19.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.6%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Israeli Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 72.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Israeli Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongIsraeli
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Tragic
32.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Tragic
72.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Fair
82.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Israeli Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 21.3%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.25%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.96%), and family households (66.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Israeli Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongIsraeli
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
28.6%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Israeli Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.0%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Israeli Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongIsraeli
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Tragic
12.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
87.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
51.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Tragic
16.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
5.2%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Israeli Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 41.1%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and bachelor's degree (48.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.55%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.80%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Israeli Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongIsraeli
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Excellent
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Excellent
96.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
95.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
93.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Exceptional
90.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
65.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Exceptional
53.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
20.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Israeli Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.6%), disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.12%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Israeli Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongIsraeli
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
46.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Good
2.4%