Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Eritrea Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,035,788 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Immigrants from Eritrea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 15.1 Immigrants from Eritrea.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $93,466, a difference of 37.1%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $85,025, a difference of 31.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $97,373, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 19.0%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $60,096, a difference of 19.1%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $41,485, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 53.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 52.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.0%), single father poverty (14.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 26.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 39.1%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 36.8%), and births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and family households (66.1% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 0.14%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.6%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.2%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 33.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.7%).