Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Spanish American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,495,313 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Spanish American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 2.8 Spanish American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($56,709 compared to $34,195, a difference of 65.8%), median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $44,010, a difference of 59.4%), and median family income ($131,067 compared to $85,728, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $55,573, a difference of 11.7%), wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $53,077, a difference of 34.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 64.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 62.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and single male poverty (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 49.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 58.7%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 56.9%), and single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 5.7%), married-couple households (49.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and family households (66.1% compared to 71.2%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 66.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 40.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.3%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 161.9%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 141.6%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 113.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 43.2%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.7%), and disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 7.4%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 15.6%).