Immigrants from Cambodia vs Immigrants from Guyana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,705,601 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.508. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Immigrants from Guyana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to a decrease of 17.9 Immigrants from Guyana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 26.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,537 compared to $90,186, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,450 compared to $55,726, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,090 compared to $45,204, a difference of 0.25%), per capita income ($40,434 compared to $40,742, a difference of 0.76%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,580 compared to $56,495, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 21.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.090%), single female poverty (21.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.78%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 45.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 42.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 34.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.1%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.13%), births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 188.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 117.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 87.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 27.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 60.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 87.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.6%), no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and college, under 1 year (61.5% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (88.1% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.0%), 11th grade (89.6% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and 9th grade (92.4% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.3%).