Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chippewa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cambodia
Chippewa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Cambodia
Chippewa
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
3.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chippewa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,118,115 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.741 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 15.3%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cambodia | Chippewa |
Minimum | 7.4% | 7.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 78.4% |
Range | 92.6% | 71.4% |
Mean | 29.0% | 25.6% |
Median | 17.1% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.3% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.4% | 31.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.0% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.4% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.9% | 15.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cambodia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cambodia are Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Africa (14.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |