Immigrants from Argentina vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Argentina
Chippewa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Argentina
Chippewa
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Argentina vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,391,050 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.089 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,009,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 27.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Argentina | Chippewa |
Minimum | 1.8% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 14.0% | 20.9% |
Range | 12.2% | 18.9% |
Mean | 5.7% | 9.1% |
Median | 5.4% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 3.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Immigrants from Japan (5.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sweden (5.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Egyptian (5.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Indonesia (5.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Bulgarian (5.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Cree (7.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |