Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,951,770 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.200% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 200.4 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 11.5%), per capita income ($37,699 compared to $33,931, a difference of 11.1%), and median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $33,236, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,232 compared to $52,801, a difference of 0.82%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,764 compared to $84,910, a difference of 2.2%), and median household income ($74,847 compared to $73,160, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (21.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 35.5%), single male poverty (17.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 23.7%), and receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (25.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.56%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (22.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.0%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 2.9%), births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.52, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 64.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 39.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 29.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 38.2%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 37.3%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.2%), ambulatory disability (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and female disability (13.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.4%).