Australian vs French Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,913,875 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.286% in French. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 285.6 French.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and French communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $43,685, a difference of 19.2%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $102,368, a difference of 15.7%), and median household income ($96,490 compared to $83,468, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $51,230, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $59,656, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and French communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.7%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.32%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.66%), and male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and French communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.040%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and French communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and French communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 13.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.77%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.10, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and French communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 35.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and French communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 38.6%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.6%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.1% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and French communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 22.6%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 8.6%).