Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,366,687 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.192. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 33.6 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 40.5%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $40,895, a difference of 18.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $52,437, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $55,598, a difference of 3.5%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $51,376, a difference of 7.4%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $93,988, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 35.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 32.1%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.96%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 38.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 31.2%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.1%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 0.0%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.33, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 213.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 81.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 66.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 20.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 46.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 66.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 55.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.6%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 79.9%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 53.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.3%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 7.5%).