Austrian vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,263,599 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.089% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to an increase of 89.5 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 46.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,692 compared to $91,347, a difference of 19.0%), and median family income ($111,306 compared to $93,988, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,923 compared to $40,895, a difference of 0.070%), householder income under 25 years ($51,898 compared to $52,437, a difference of 1.0%), and median earnings ($49,501 compared to $45,729, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 57.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 46.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.62%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 38.3%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 35.3%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 31.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 32.5%), married-couple households (48.6% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.47%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 179.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 64.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 18.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 45.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 56.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 60.1%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.4%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.0%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 27.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.40%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.2%).