Canadian vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,528,948 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.531. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 24.8 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 45.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $91,347, a difference of 14.5%), and median family income ($106,597 compared to $93,988, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $52,437, a difference of 0.19%), median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $40,895, a difference of 2.9%), and median earnings ($47,911 compared to $45,729, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 49.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 42.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.18%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 36.8%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 31.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 32.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 28.4%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.44%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 196.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 66.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 19.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 45.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 57.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 57.5%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.9%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 40.2%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 30.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.2%), female disability (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.6%).