Immigrants from Morocco vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,278,054 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within Immigrant from Morocco communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.546. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Morocco within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.068% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Morocco corresponds to an increase of 67.9 Immigrants from Jamaica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 28.0%), per capita income ($46,430 compared to $38,766, a difference of 19.8%), and median family income ($105,964 compared to $89,268, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,593 compared to $51,038, a difference of 7.0%), median female earnings ($42,229 compared to $38,625, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,647 compared to $54,027, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 41.9%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 22.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 3.4%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 32.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 32.5%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 27.8%), and currently married (45.4% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.72%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.33, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (62.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 49.6%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 38.9%), and master's degree (17.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.4%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%).