Immigrants from Middle Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants from Middle Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
19.2%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,454,449 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.288 and weighted average of 19.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.92% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Middle Africa influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Immigrants from Middle Africa simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (19.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Cape Verdean (19.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Potawatomi (19.2%, a difference of 0.18%), French American Indian (19.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Guyana (19.3%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants from Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants from Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants from Guyana | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants from Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants from Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.047% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 11.5% | 39.2% |
Range | 11.4% | 37.6% |
Mean | 3.2% | 18.6% |
Median | 2.6% | 19.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 21.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 8.2% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Middle Africa Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.047% | 131,539,454 | 17.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 32,963,983 | 19.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 14,989,381 | 19.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 7,402,488 | 19.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 4,515,672 | 21.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 2,639,564 | 18.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 1,544,804 | 17.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 930,533 | 19.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 924,373 | 19.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 885,219 | 21.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 615,845 | 18.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 275,490 | 21.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 226,667 | 20.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 292,251 | 22.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.86% | 291,323 | 21.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 164,911 | 22.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 122,311 | 24.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 153,287 | 31.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 194,542 | 17.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 123,114 | 15.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 10,536 | 21.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.78% | 7,080 | 31.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 105,607 | 12.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.02% | 37,753 | 14.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 19,888 | 11.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.40% | 43,554 | 11.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.54% | 125,905 | 17.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.69% | 2,330 | 1.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 7,703 | 36.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.17% | 69,634 | 20.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 75,988 | 11.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.46% | 28,427 | 15.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 16,426 | 1.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.75% | 27,909 | 18.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.89% | 26,684 | 34.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.64% | 16,944 | 39.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 2,699 | 7.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.84% | 13,580 | 7.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.92% | 3,104 | 19.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.99% | 15,489 | 15.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.47% | 1,997 | 2.6% |