Sioux Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,838,275 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.644 and weighted average of 25.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.60% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Sioux and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Sioux influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Sioux simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Sioux by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Yup'ik (25.8%, a difference of 0.93%), Pueblo (25.2%, a difference of 1.5%), Menominee (25.0%, a difference of 2.2%), Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and Crow (26.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Kiowa	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 23.7%
Immigrants from Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 23.8%
Apache	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 23.8%
Natives/Alaskans	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 24.0%
Blacks/African Americans	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 24.7%
Menominee	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 25.0%
Pueblo	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 25.2%
Sioux	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 25.6%
Yup'ik	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 25.8%
Cheyenne	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 26.3%
Crow	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 26.4%
Yuman	0.0 /100 \| #340	Tragic 27.1%
Hopi	0.0 /100 \| #341	Tragic 27.9%
Pima	0.0 /100 \| #342	Tragic 28.2%
Immigrants from Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #343	Tragic 29.5%

Sioux Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Sioux Data	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data
Minimum	0.069%	1.8%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	99.9%	98.2%
Mean	44.5%	45.0%
Median	42.6%	35.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	15.6%	19.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	71.3%	64.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	55.7%	45.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	30.8%	28.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	30.6%	28.7%

Correlation Details

Sioux Percentile	Sample Size	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.069%	224,574,026	18.0%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68%	4,233,514	17.1%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23%	968,685	16.2%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71%	441,289	15.9%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17%	575,297	14.5%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73%	171,050	15.3%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.27%	147,281	19.7%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71%	74,375	18.9%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.29%	90,104	9.6%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58%	40,613	14.7%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.29%	19,533	16.1%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.83%	16,459	27.0%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.39%	41,354	24.8%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.74%	32,137	21.5%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.31%	5,611	17.4%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.87%	2,885	32.1%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21%	4,033	25.9%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.88%	20,449	18.3%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.19%	12,359	33.6%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.85%	37,555	15.5%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.28%	3,064	30.8%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.52%	75,762	21.5%
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30%	26,279	15.3%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.73%	2,763	32.7%
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.23%	7,114	24.2%
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.76%	10,756	47.8%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.12%	968	1.8%
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.89%	3,514	19.0%
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.18%	818	56.8%
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.79%	47,142	33.8%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.38%	5,721	35.9%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.81%	7,609	34.9%
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.42%	6,057	39.3%
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.75%	1,014	82.0%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.15%	3,268	41.3%
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.83%	154	9.1%
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.63%	3,510	25.7%
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.30%	739	7.7%
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.63%	5,226	21.2%
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.27%	1,763	25.5%
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.54%	65	16.7%
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.26%	3,446	24.1%
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.69%	1,441	30.6%
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.71%	97	38.7%
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.74%	5,437	26.7%
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.24%	638	8.3%
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.87%	688	32.5%
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.37%	1,547	9.0%
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.73%	1,979	30.9%
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.94%	1,479	99.4%
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.42%	503	21.0%
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.71%	414	50.6%
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.15%	534	9.8%
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.20%	484	13.3%
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.73%	440	24.4%
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.18%	1,021	100.0%
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.85%	858	11.6%
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.20%	125	100.0%
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.54%	1,210	19.0%
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.74%	842	21.2%
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.63%	627	19.3%
[ 42.0% - 42.5% ] 42.16%	1,155	12.4%
[ 42.5% - 43.0% ] 42.58%	209	8.3%
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.40%	106	100.0%
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.61%	876	53.2%
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.17%	1,621	10.3%
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.50%	286	84.8%
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.15%	2,195	46.7%
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.83%	3,410	15.8%
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.22%	197	100.0%
[ 48.5% - 49.0% ] 48.75%	681	34.6%
[ 49.0% - 49.5% ] 49.30%	3,509	34.9%
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.36%	2,921	32.7%
[ 50.5% - 51.0% ] 50.74%	1,346	58.1%
[ 51.5% - 52.0% ] 51.86%	295	68.8%
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.99%	1,504	72.4%
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.24%	59	100.0%
[ 55.0% - 55.5% ] 55.13%	5,389	44.4%
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.14%	6,596	35.5%
[ 57.0% - 57.5% ] 57.21%	3,905	50.0%
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.58%	574	44.6%
[ 60.0% - 60.5% ] 60.20%	912	32.0%
[ 61.0% - 61.5% ] 61.48%	283	79.8%
[ 62.0% - 62.5% ] 62.10%	926	78.0%
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.12%	526	17.2%
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.38%	146	59.1%
[ 65.0% - 65.5% ] 65.24%	1,168	65.7%
[ 66.0% - 66.5% ] 66.30%	362	43.8%
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.75%	2,505	73.1%
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.99%	2,009	53.5%
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.23%	3,516	57.4%
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.90%	1,256	73.9%
[ 70.0% - 70.5% ] 70.42%	896	61.6%
[ 70.5% - 71.0% ] 70.93%	626	55.9%
[ 71.5% - 72.0% ] 71.62%	229	100.0%
[ 72.5% - 73.0% ] 72.72%	766	66.4%
[ 74.5% - 75.0% ] 74.78%	1,812	47.1%
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.64%	2,274	55.1%
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.79%	280	88.6%
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.10%	262	32.6%
[ 77.5% - 78.0% ] 77.87%	470	36.7%
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.26%	233	87.9%
[ 82.0% - 82.5% ] 82.47%	3,629	64.1%
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.33%	144	81.8%
[ 83.5% - 84.0% ] 83.79%	7,820	45.4%
[ 84.0% - 84.5% ] 84.39%	410	82.8%
[ 85.0% - 85.5% ] 85.30%	2,572	59.9%
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.74%	2,097	54.0%
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.77%	3,484	64.5%
[ 87.0% - 87.5% ] 87.50%	176	42.9%
[ 87.5% - 88.0% ] 87.67%	681	100.0%
[ 88.0% - 88.5% ] 88.38%	1,041	80.2%
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.92%	343	94.2%
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.30%	355	94.5%
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.54%	1,443	64.7%
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.32%	940	42.7%
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.85%	1,903	55.4%
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.28%	661	63.2%
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.47%	1,256	36.4%
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.47%	434	100.0%
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.40%	500	100.0%
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.83%	1,042	33.0%
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.27%	183	100.0%
[ 97.5% - 98.0% ] 97.86%	841	94.0%
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00%	2,304	89.5%

Sioux Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

COMPARE

Sioux Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Tragic

Sioux Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Sioux by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Sioux Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Sioux Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Tragic