Cherokee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,336,049 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445 and weighted average of 19.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.31% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Cherokee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Cherokee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Cherokee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Immigrants from Barbados (19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Liberian (19.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from El Salvador (20.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Spanish American Indian (19.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.32%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants from Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.8%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants from Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.9%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.9%
Liberians	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.9%
Cherokee	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 19.9%
Immigrants from Barbados	0.1 /100 \| #271	Tragic 19.9%
Immigrants from El Salvador	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 20.0%
Bangladeshis	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 20.0%
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines	0.0 /100 \| #274	Tragic 20.1%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.0 /100 \| #275	Tragic 20.1%
Comanche	0.0 /100 \| #276	Tragic 20.2%
Belizeans	0.0 /100 \| #277	Tragic 20.2%

Cherokee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Cherokee Data	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data
Minimum	0.20%	5.3%
Maximum	96.8%	100.0%
Range	96.6%	94.7%
Mean	33.2%	30.7%
Median	28.9%	26.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	14.3%	21.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	47.7%	34.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	33.4%	13.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	23.6%	16.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	23.5%	16.4%

Correlation Details

Cherokee Percentile	Sample Size	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.20%	401,922,261	17.5%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67%	55,677,748	18.2%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19%	11,381,345	20.2%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74%	5,417,553	21.8%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22%	2,528,904	21.8%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72%	1,405,053	23.5%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23%	780,093	23.6%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75%	591,822	22.9%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.26%	368,000	25.0%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80%	787,876	27.5%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.24%	415,635	22.3%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78%	363,328	19.2%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16%	118,833	23.3%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79%	137,416	24.3%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.25%	146,346	25.8%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.76%	184,443	20.7%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33%	68,756	25.7%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72%	101,972	17.6%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.29%	60,306	20.0%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.81%	32,494	35.5%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.22%	52,501	24.1%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.66%	25,466	25.9%
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30%	16,236	26.0%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.88%	20,199	29.7%
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.20%	41,410	26.5%
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.89%	4,198	36.9%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.23%	10,644	34.5%
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.88%	18,924	13.1%
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.29%	53,223	30.0%
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.81%	45,933	28.7%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.29%	11,357	28.0%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.86%	8,831	22.1%
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.09%	37,797	18.1%
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.90%	70,517	28.9%
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.25%	10,835	29.5%
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.85%	7,276	22.1%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.16%	38,935	24.2%
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.77%	19,423	20.9%
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.11%	1,685	24.4%
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.83%	847	14.3%
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.18%	31,496	25.6%
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.88%	18,733	22.0%
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.14%	6,136	30.5%
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.73%	15,008	25.2%
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.17%	3,685	34.7%
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.77%	3,966	35.9%
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.67%	5,720	31.8%
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.28%	13,446	28.0%
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.93%	2,359	20.7%
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.42%	17,432	18.5%
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.65%	9,340	46.4%
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.25%	8,457	22.5%
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.67%	1,541	62.1%
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.42%	19,115	32.6%
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.72%	2,453	25.2%
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.20%	3,316	28.5%
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.79%	1,466	40.6%
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.10%	756	55.8%
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.70%	10,864	25.0%
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.25%	4,503	14.9%
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.80%	6,717	39.6%
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.20%	7,285	41.5%
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.82%	7,184	32.5%
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.26%	496	49.0%
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.62%	2,293	33.8%
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.49%	16,782	12.7%
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.55%	1,368	24.5%
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.71%	4,500	35.4%
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.41%	6,735	24.1%
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.87%	11,892	30.4%
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.28%	317	15.4%
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.52%	827	51.5%
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.17%	460	18.9%
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.41%	3,697	32.6%
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.69%	32,250	20.0%
[ 39.5% - 40.0% ] 39.57%	4,554	41.2%
[ 40.0% - 40.5% ] 40.30%	6,665	20.7%
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.23%	1,266	48.8%
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.80%	3,050	42.5%
[ 42.0% - 42.5% ] 42.16%	268	14.3%
[ 42.5% - 43.0% ] 42.74%	1,542	34.4%
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.89%	540	43.3%
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.47%	389	14.3%
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.03%	2,900	21.4%
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.41%	2,871	21.9%
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.66%	770	30.6%
[ 49.0% - 49.5% ] 49.42%	4,589	34.3%
[ 50.5% - 51.0% ] 50.84%	1,548	32.2%
[ 51.5% - 52.0% ] 51.89%	318	61.9%
[ 52.5% - 53.0% ] 52.65%	3,732	29.8%
[ 53.0% - 53.5% ] 53.37%	1,186	6.2%
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.22%	249	33.3%
[ 55.0% - 55.5% ] 55.25%	1,171	9.8%
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.09%	1,175	30.3%
[ 58.0% - 58.5% ] 58.05%	348	52.1%
[ 58.5% - 59.0% ] 58.89%	270	5.3%
[ 59.0% - 59.5% ] 59.09%	12,720	31.7%
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.93%	277	59.1%
[ 62.0% - 62.5% ] 62.09%	306	33.3%
[ 65.0% - 65.5% ] 65.38%	598	52.5%
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.58%	386	6.2%
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.07%	570	8.1%
[ 68.5% - 69.0% ] 68.84%	138	100.0%
[ 69.0% - 69.5% ] 69.19%	1,279	35.1%
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.72%	535	18.3%
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.00%	620	34.0%
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.44%	1,604	51.7%
[ 76.0% - 76.5% ] 76.10%	410	15.2%
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.02%	6,854	24.4%
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.43%	46	62.5%
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.85%	726	34.4%
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.21%	154	68.4%
[ 93.5% - 94.0% ] 93.94%	66	100.0%
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.79%	343	86.3%

Cherokee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

COMPARE

Cherokee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Tragic

Cherokee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Cherokee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Cherokee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Tragic