Scotch-Irish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Scotch-Irish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
16.7%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
39.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 529,237,473 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.510 and weighted average of 16.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.2% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Scotch-Irish influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Scotch-Irish simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Portugal (16.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (16.6%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Iraq (16.6%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Syria (16.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and Hawaiian (16.6%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants from Western Asia | 44.1 /100 | #177 | Average 16.6% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 43.6 /100 | #178 | Average 16.6% |
| Hawaiians | 43.4 /100 | #179 | Average 16.6% |
| Immigrants from Syria | 43.3 /100 | #180 | Average 16.6% |
| Immigrants from Iraq | 43.2 /100 | #181 | Average 16.6% |
| Immigrants from Ethiopia | 43.1 /100 | #182 | Average 16.6% |
| Immigrants from Portugal | 42.5 /100 | #183 | Average 16.6% |
| Scotch-Irish | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 16.7% |
| Immigrants from Uruguay | 35.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 16.7% |
| South American Indians | 35.0 /100 | #186 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants from Morocco | 34.6 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.8% |
| Arabs | 34.5 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
| Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants from the Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Scotch-Irish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scotch-Irish Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.25% | 8.9% |
| Maximum | 53.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 53.3% | 91.1% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 36.0% |
| Median | 13.2% | 24.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 46.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 27.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 26.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 26.4% |
Correlation Details
| Scotch-Irish Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 205,257,612 | 19.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 177,774,434 | 16.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 79,469,698 | 15.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 34,515,196 | 15.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21% | 14,948,916 | 16.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 7,263,631 | 16.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 4,634,137 | 16.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.76% | 2,197,746 | 19.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 1,098,954 | 18.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.76% | 580,599 | 18.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.22% | 547,181 | 16.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.72% | 272,141 | 20.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.30% | 110,717 | 18.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 101,673 | 23.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.23% | 83,586 | 22.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.79% | 85,227 | 25.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.23% | 39,632 | 24.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.75% | 51,917 | 22.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.24% | 22,347 | 24.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.76% | 24,965 | 25.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.28% | 30,042 | 27.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.68% | 17,253 | 31.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.24% | 10,589 | 24.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.86% | 9,596 | 34.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.22% | 3,691 | 22.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 553 | 100.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.23% | 16,676 | 34.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.71% | 13,250 | 40.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.22% | 13,168 | 18.8% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.80% | 223 | 100.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.15% | 4,520 | 51.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.88% | 3,325 | 67.1% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.25% | 7,629 | 18.5% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.91% | 2,424 | 8.9% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.26% | 3,794 | 26.3% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.58% | 5,659 | 10.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.30% | 1,628 | 69.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.66% | 2,642 | 81.4% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.71% | 974 | 15.9% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.24% | 499 | 54.3% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.90% | 268 | 68.4% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.34% | 731 | 51.9% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.73% | 939 | 27.9% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.71% | 960 | 97.1% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.48% | 903 | 41.0% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.79% | 570 | 38.3% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.49% | 217 | 14.3% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.25% | 2,724 | 32.0% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.22% | 450 | 71.0% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.59% | 185 | 14.3% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.40% | 728 | 21.1% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.18% | 55 | 100.0% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.51% | 299 | 100.0% |