Blackfeet Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Blackfeet Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
20.5%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 306,739,151 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313 and weighted average of 20.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.24% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Blackfeet and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Blackfeet influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Blackfeet simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Iroquois (20.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Haitian (20.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (20.3%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Belize (20.6%, a difference of 0.66%), and Yaqui (20.3%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants from Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.2% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.3% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 20.3% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 20.3% |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 20.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 20.4% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 20.5% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 20.5% |
| Immigrants from Belize | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 20.6% |
| Immigrants from Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 20.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 20.6% |
| Immigrants from Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 20.6% |
| Immigrants from Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Immigrants from Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 20.7% |
Blackfeet Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Blackfeet Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.087% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 92.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 92.7% | 98.0% |
| Mean | 24.5% | 43.8% |
| Median | 8.9% | 39.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 25.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.3% | 56.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.8% | 31.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 32.5% | 25.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.0% | 24.8% |
Correlation Details
| Blackfeet Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.087% | 298,606,076 | 18.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 6,221,228 | 19.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 887,966 | 25.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 623,871 | 24.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 194,292 | 25.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.69% | 55,419 | 30.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 36,993 | 36.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.76% | 25,761 | 26.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.29% | 25,314 | 21.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70% | 3,597 | 48.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 4,416 | 50.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.85% | 10,917 | 27.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 5,388 | 24.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 2,403 | 14.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 2,933 | 13.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.64% | 2,645 | 2.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.45% | 1,799 | 46.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.78% | 1,901 | 34.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.01% | 322 | 77.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 160 | 36.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.32% | 853 | 70.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.26% | 1,563 | 25.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.24% | 147 | 93.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.78% | 266 | 67.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.37% | 167 | 100.0% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.94% | 3,061 | 46.8% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.98% | 5,008 | 39.1% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.53% | 85 | 68.4% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.48% | 69 | 100.0% |
[ 82.0% - 82.5% ] 82.35% | 1,654 | 47.3% |
[ 84.0% - 84.5% ] 84.09% | 7,532 | 38.9% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.65% | 871 | 39.7% |
[ 88.0% - 88.5% ] 88.34% | 3,001 | 39.9% |
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.96% | 229 | 84.9% |
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.43% | 690 | 51.2% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.78% | 554 | 62.3% |