Colville Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Colville
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Colville Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
22.5%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colville Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,561,813 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Colville and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102 and weighted average of 22.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Colville within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.090% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Colville and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Colville influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Colville simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Colville by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Yakama (22.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Cajun (22.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Paiute (22.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Congo (22.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Honduras (22.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants from Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants from Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants from Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Colville Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Colville Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.026% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 82.8% | 92.7% |
| Range | 82.8% | 84.4% |
| Mean | 24.7% | 36.0% |
| Median | 10.7% | 28.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.0% | 50.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 42.2% | 31.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.9% | 23.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.5% | 23.5% |
Correlation Details
| Colville Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.026% | 34,324,573 | 18.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 123,978 | 22.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.29% | 32,424 | 29.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 13,619 | 8.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 17,953 | 9.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 5,867 | 29.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.37% | 5,404 | 35.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 4,957 | 15.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 5,033 | 26.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.44% | 643 | 25.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.53% | 561 | 87.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.15% | 439 | 80.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.54% | 5,241 | 25.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.92% | 1,098 | 50.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.15% | 1,034 | 69.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.66% | 122 | 33.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.60% | 638 | 92.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.22% | 9,218 | 26.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.99% | 1,377 | 16.8% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.45% | 424 | 79.0% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.81% | 1,538 | 14.6% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.06% | 1,334 | 14.7% |
[ 42.0% - 42.5% ] 42.28% | 395 | 60.8% |
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.01% | 276 | 28.6% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.15% | 270 | 29.4% |
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.38% | 568 | 44.4% |
[ 64.5% - 65.0% ] 64.91% | 1,103 | 18.2% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.97% | 256 | 50.0% |
[ 70.5% - 71.0% ] 70.97% | 155 | 18.8% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.66% | 977 | 31.9% |
[ 82.5% - 83.0% ] 82.84% | 338 | 21.1% |