Romanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Romanian
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Romanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
15.0%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
95.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 369,938,935 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.478 and weighted average of 15.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.6% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Romanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Romanians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Romanians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Romanians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Chilean (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), British (15.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from South Africa (15.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants from Latvia | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Basques | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants from Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants from South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants from Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants from England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants from Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants from Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants from Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Romanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Romanian Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.10% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 23.2% | 70.0% |
| Range | 23.1% | 66.0% |
| Mean | 5.9% | 23.0% |
| Median | 4.1% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 28.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 17.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 19.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 19.0% |
Correlation Details
| Romanian Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 280,675,005 | 16.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 60,709,643 | 15.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 14,693,926 | 11.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 6,972,223 | 11.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 3,079,370 | 12.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.46% | 1,345,867 | 11.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 852,669 | 11.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 514,560 | 14.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 275,319 | 8.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.52% | 268,235 | 22.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 186,948 | 18.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 18,543 | 12.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.34% | 104,974 | 21.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.63% | 85,013 | 24.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.97% | 44,644 | 23.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.13% | 63,659 | 38.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.50% | 5,550 | 16.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.59% | 218 | 5.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.88% | 1,373 | 6.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.23% | 1,855 | 4.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 15,623 | 4.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.97% | 4,839 | 43.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.52% | 3,066 | 28.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.84% | 3,858 | 63.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.94% | 2,405 | 6.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.64% | 141 | 70.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.56% | 5,501 | 68.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.10% | 1,885 | 4.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.75% | 278 | 28.8% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.22% | 783 | 26.6% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.18% | 962 | 60.7% |