Welsh Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Welsh
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Welsh Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
15.6%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
85.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,157,850 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.717 and weighted average of 15.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Welsh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.5% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Welsh and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Welsh influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Welsh simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Welsh by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.29%), Canadian (15.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Jordan (15.6%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
| New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Immigrants from Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Immigrants from Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Immigrants from Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Welsh Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Welsh Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.24% | 9.5% |
| Maximum | 36.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 36.1% | 90.5% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 35.5% |
| Median | 10.3% | 19.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 17.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 56.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 39.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 29.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 28.8% |
Correlation Details
| Welsh Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.24% | 282,351,801 | 19.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 156,768,560 | 14.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 45,496,732 | 13.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 14,593,525 | 13.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.08% | 5,941,725 | 13.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 2,876,665 | 14.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.05% | 1,089,743 | 17.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.57% | 722,672 | 19.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 354,472 | 19.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.49% | 194,485 | 20.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.97% | 260,338 | 17.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.45% | 137,190 | 22.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.91% | 77,923 | 12.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.38% | 71,520 | 25.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.86% | 36,020 | 25.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.32% | 32,112 | 18.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 35,675 | 19.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.30% | 17,599 | 19.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.76% | 13,053 | 17.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.24% | 14,615 | 19.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75% | 8,627 | 11.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.25% | 3,619 | 51.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.73% | 4,447 | 44.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.19% | 2,582 | 21.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.62% | 12,886 | 11.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.28% | 8,075 | 63.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.45% | 1,887 | 66.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.00% | 200 | 66.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.48% | 4,762 | 23.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.02% | 1,605 | 9.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.54% | 6,952 | 68.8% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.05% | 186 | 88.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.48% | 659 | 76.9% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.76% | 825 | 23.3% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.82% | 1,549 | 19.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.43% | 9,039 | 10.5% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.87% | 151 | 56.9% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.28% | 143 | 35.0% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.53% | 2,632 | 18.2% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.54% | 216 | 100.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.56% | 64 | 100.0% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.21% | 173 | 100.0% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.30% | 146 | 100.0% |