Potawatomi Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Potawatomi Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
19.2%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,080,271 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.405 and weighted average of 19.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.59% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Potawatomi and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Potawatomi influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Potawatomi simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are French American Indian (19.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Cape Verdean (19.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (19.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (19.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Guyana (19.3%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants from Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants from Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants from Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants from Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants from Guyana | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants from Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants from Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Potawatomi Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Potawatomi Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.027% | 5.7% |
Maximum | 43.2% | 60.0% |
Range | 43.1% | 54.3% |
Mean | 8.6% | 25.7% |
Median | 5.1% | 22.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 31.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 15.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 14.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 13.8% |
Correlation Details
Potawatomi Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.027% | 109,843,307 | 19.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.29% | 5,200,319 | 18.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 974,386 | 15.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 375,352 | 22.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 289,763 | 15.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 87,582 | 18.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 57,323 | 24.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 58,188 | 23.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.86% | 21,931 | 16.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.06% | 38,644 | 17.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 24,782 | 28.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 46,550 | 21.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 8,016 | 21.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 6,869 | 13.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.13% | 4,923 | 22.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.37% | 4,006 | 27.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.55% | 2,957 | 48.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 1,537 | 21.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.08% | 147 | 25.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.40% | 1,908 | 31.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 5,901 | 27.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 2,054 | 44.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.08% | 118 | 52.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.24% | 1,851 | 14.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.50% | 4,948 | 30.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.73% | 994 | 29.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.95% | 4,521 | 18.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.61% | 772 | 33.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.06% | 2,607 | 38.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 240 | 6.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.43% | 244 | 26.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.86% | 487 | 46.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.20% | 49 | 22.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.64% | 47 | 22.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.99% | 182 | 12.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 136 | 10.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.93% | 495 | 5.7% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.48% | 143 | 10.3% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.85% | 2,462 | 16.4% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 1,404 | 35.8% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.37% | 117 | 10.3% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.33% | 1,702 | 14.3% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.33% | 150 | 59.1% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.10% | 62 | 57.1% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.16% | 95 | 60.0% |