Spanish American Indian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Spanish American Indian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
19.9%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,992,816 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031 and weighted average of 19.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Spanish American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.16% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Spanish American Indians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Spanish American Indians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Liberian (19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Spanish American (19.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Cherokee (19.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Barbados (19.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Immigrants from Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Immigrants from Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Immigrants from Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Immigrants from El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Spanish American Indian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Spanish American Indian Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.014% | 6.4% |
| Maximum | 12.5% | 57.8% |
| Range | 12.5% | 51.4% |
| Mean | 1.6% | 22.2% |
| Median | 1.0% | 18.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.50% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.8% | 25.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 11.7% |
Correlation Details
| Spanish American Indian Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.014% | 63,735,969 | 20.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.089% | 4,541,499 | 18.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.15% | 1,711,550 | 21.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 1,083,588 | 15.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 684,915 | 15.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 151,795 | 16.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 106,623 | 27.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 144,837 | 12.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 28,892 | 57.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 40,024 | 22.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 8,186 | 30.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 33,717 | 10.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 7,191 | 18.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 43,636 | 15.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 42,951 | 11.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 8,564 | 16.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.02% | 21,250 | 16.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 23,173 | 21.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18% | 25,594 | 26.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 2,546 | 57.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.43% | 280 | 16.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.52% | 56,103 | 17.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 89,021 | 13.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 5,697 | 32.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 32,474 | 6.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 108,682 | 25.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 246 | 46.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 15,552 | 8.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 87,089 | 23.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.40% | 72,495 | 22.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.44% | 71,692 | 23.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.83% | 6,833 | 15.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.50% | 152 | 25.0% |