Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Slavic
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
15.7%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,780,772 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.742 and weighted average of 15.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.9% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Slavs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Slavs influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Slavs simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Icelander (15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Welsh (15.6%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Immigrants from Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Immigrants from Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Immigrants from Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
| Immigrants from Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants from Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.049% | 0.51% |
| Maximum | 32.5% | 80.7% |
| Range | 32.4% | 80.2% |
| Mean | 4.6% | 23.6% |
| Median | 2.9% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 28.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 15.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 15.6% |
Correlation Details
| Slavic Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.049% | 239,058,062 | 16.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 18,890,818 | 13.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.38% | 4,851,479 | 14.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 1,718,409 | 14.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 954,520 | 18.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 431,467 | 12.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 220,796 | 16.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 215,262 | 16.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 119,557 | 17.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 117,447 | 18.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 37,110 | 18.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 37,314 | 13.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 27,591 | 8.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 11,603 | 28.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 36,594 | 10.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 1,922 | 31.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.69% | 707 | 47.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.82% | 20,936 | 13.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.96% | 541 | 47.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 11,744 | 8.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.27% | 2,017 | 28.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.45% | 2,172 | 33.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 795 | 25.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.76% | 4,171 | 14.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 290 | 20.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.65% | 409 | 17.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.05% | 970 | 22.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.69% | 598 | 8.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.28% | 223 | 42.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.94% | 2,493 | 0.51% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.29% | 768 | 28.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.34% | 439 | 28.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.62% | 291 | 29.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.85% | 132 | 25.0% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.49% | 703 | 59.6% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.46% | 422 | 80.7% |