Norwegian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 514,648,663 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.351 and weighted average of 13.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.21% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Norwegians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Norwegians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Norwegians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Japan (13.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 0.55%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants from Lithuania	99.9 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 13.1%
Bulgarians	99.9 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 13.1%
Immigrants from Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants from Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants from Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants from China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%

Norwegian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Norwegian Data	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data
Minimum	0.25%	3.9%
Maximum	72.0%	81.0%
Range	71.8%	77.1%
Mean	30.2%	15.5%
Median	29.7%	13.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	14.7%	10.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	44.6%	16.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	29.9%	5.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	18.1%	10.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	18.0%	10.9%

Correlation Details

Norwegian Percentile	Sample Size	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25%	232,438,274	21.3%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71%	130,594,903	15.1%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22%	48,620,680	13.1%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73%	27,283,055	11.8%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24%	17,615,597	11.2%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74%	10,959,198	12.2%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25%	8,111,020	13.0%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77%	6,950,386	11.6%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24%	4,807,764	13.0%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74%	3,395,384	13.5%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.25%	2,058,492	12.3%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77%	2,038,466	10.4%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.29%	1,753,568	12.6%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.80%	1,621,209	15.6%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.29%	999,411	13.1%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.72%	1,039,552	13.6%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24%	618,575	12.3%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.80%	620,716	12.3%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.25%	944,341	17.4%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75%	887,273	14.2%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.27%	575,996	10.3%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75%	921,484	9.1%
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.23%	914,162	9.5%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.75%	1,000,276	11.4%
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.27%	1,041,920	9.6%
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.75%	581,344	8.6%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.22%	799,463	8.2%
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.71%	561,080	10.1%
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.27%	509,819	8.4%
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.74%	456,432	10.7%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.24%	400,821	9.9%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.75%	347,924	11.0%
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.22%	221,252	9.7%
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.72%	342,339	11.7%
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.18%	189,773	9.8%
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.79%	157,670	14.5%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.24%	130,987	9.1%
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.74%	97,444	11.0%
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.22%	82,870	12.2%
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.75%	66,024	13.9%
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.26%	150,708	10.4%
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.74%	42,648	16.2%
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.22%	94,001	9.7%
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.74%	69,888	13.4%
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.35%	67,511	12.7%
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.81%	81,762	14.5%
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.20%	36,631	15.6%
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.86%	83,153	20.2%
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.29%	21,076	13.9%
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.85%	48,483	13.6%
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.37%	42,930	10.9%
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.62%	205,068	17.0%
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.22%	128,414	18.8%
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.60%	41,862	12.3%
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.20%	151,665	18.4%
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.63%	58,872	17.0%
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.24%	20,053	9.3%
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.80%	97,456	4.2%
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.22%	43,641	14.8%
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.73%	30,987	8.7%
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.31%	28,444	19.9%
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.69%	9,894	15.7%
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.36%	15,014	10.0%
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.81%	12,444	10.7%
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.27%	8,927	12.3%
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.89%	30,174	20.9%
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.26%	31,138	13.0%
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.76%	4,579	25.2%
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.17%	23,354	18.7%
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.63%	9,434	14.2%
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.26%	19,151	13.0%
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.76%	16,246	7.8%
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.11%	32,012	13.2%
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.77%	13,232	15.6%
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.14%	5,854	13.9%
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.70%	10,121	13.9%
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.20%	8,827	14.1%
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.74%	8,852	22.3%
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.21%	2,971	12.1%
[ 39.5% - 40.0% ] 39.67%	5,017	8.1%
[ 40.0% - 40.5% ] 40.19%	3,526	15.5%
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.64%	6,021	17.7%
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.19%	5,871	13.0%
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.70%	4,185	19.1%
[ 42.0% - 42.5% ] 42.44%	7,212	15.8%
[ 42.5% - 43.0% ] 42.76%	5,910	3.9%
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.20%	1,933	22.0%
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.78%	1,777	31.1%
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.33%	1,306	12.6%
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.62%	1,542	19.5%
[ 45.0% - 45.5% ] 45.38%	2,717	11.9%
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.84%	5,048	13.5%
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.30%	2,028	16.7%
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.97%	775	25.0%
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.14%	2,431	7.1%
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.65%	1,784	6.3%
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.24%	1,762	25.8%
[ 48.5% - 49.0% ] 48.67%	2,967	31.4%
[ 49.0% - 49.5% ] 49.31%	1,440	12.9%
[ 49.5% - 50.0% ] 49.71%	1,199	15.7%
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.30%	2,636	8.1%
[ 50.5% - 51.0% ] 50.65%	2,371	13.1%
[ 51.0% - 51.5% ] 51.18%	551	21.3%
[ 52.0% - 52.5% ] 52.20%	1,615	9.1%
[ 52.5% - 53.0% ] 52.89%	121	81.0%
[ 53.0% - 53.5% ] 53.40%	1,736	8.2%
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.73%	1,515	10.1%
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.13%	1,766	14.6%
[ 55.0% - 55.5% ] 55.47%	2,104	11.5%
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.52%	679	24.4%
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.75%	719	14.3%
[ 57.5% - 58.0% ] 57.69%	338	65.9%
[ 58.0% - 58.5% ] 58.06%	434	6.2%
[ 61.0% - 61.5% ] 61.36%	88	29.2%
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.48%	178	10.0%
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.02%	264	30.4%
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.70%	242	76.0%
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.74%	155	25.0%
[ 72.0% - 72.5% ] 72.04%	279	8.0%

Norwegian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

COMPARE

Norwegian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16Exceptional

Norwegian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Norwegian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Norwegian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Exceptional