Immigrants from Jordan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants from Jordan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
15.6%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
87.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,197,241 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 15.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 7.3% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Jordan influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Immigrants from Jordan simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are New Zealander (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (15.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Armenian (15.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants from Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
| South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
| New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants from Jordan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.021% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 7.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 7.7% | 98.4% |
| Mean | 1.7% | 19.3% |
| Median | 1.3% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.64% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.2% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 17.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 16.9% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Jordan Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.021% | 82,988,042 | 18.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.057% | 44,268,675 | 18.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.094% | 18,023,913 | 14.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 11,902,369 | 13.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 5,931,533 | 13.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 3,559,101 | 13.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 2,740,704 | 13.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.29% | 2,129,914 | 11.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 1,176,626 | 9.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 1,134,503 | 11.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 780,210 | 15.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44% | 1,207,011 | 18.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48% | 319,395 | 18.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 457,483 | 13.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 422,672 | 12.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 414,055 | 16.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 353,525 | 14.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 276,118 | 7.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 152,321 | 11.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 266,648 | 13.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 162,372 | 12.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 46,082 | 18.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.86% | 96,136 | 19.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 170,237 | 12.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 85,562 | 4.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 6,664 | 4.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 72,913 | 8.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 14,982 | 8.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 132,921 | 28.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 82,468 | 27.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 48,116 | 11.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 91,203 | 8.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 79,932 | 33.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 64,439 | 17.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 44,281 | 7.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 37,601 | 6.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 54,590 | 11.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 21,615 | 18.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 14,360 | 40.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 8,220 | 14.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.59% | 36,556 | 21.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 12,525 | 39.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.76% | 14,650 | 10.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 51,537 | 10.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.83% | 25,489 | 8.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 21,760 | 13.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 6,496 | 20.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.01% | 14,915 | 12.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.05% | 6,549 | 1.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 2,160 | 20.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 7,763 | 6.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 13,291 | 23.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 15,452 | 7.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.80% | 9,960 | 31.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 29,883 | 21.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.14% | 3,317 | 38.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 8,535 | 12.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 889 | 29.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,804 | 19.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.48% | 28,568 | 31.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.60% | 8,919 | 44.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.95% | 11,084 | 23.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.03% | 10,859 | 23.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.01% | 8,024 | 9.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.41% | 562 | 100.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 182 | 100.0% |