French Canadian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
French Canadian
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
French Canadian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
16.1%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
68.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
French Canadian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,191,826 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 16.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.66% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of French Canadians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of French Canadians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if French Canadians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to French Canadians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are Immigrants from Oceania (16.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Germany (16.1%, a difference of 0.19%), South American (16.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (16.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants from Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
| Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
| Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
| French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
| Immigrants from Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
| French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants from Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants from Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
| South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
| Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
French Canadian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | French Canadian Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 60.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 60.4% | 97.4% |
| Mean | 19.2% | 27.4% |
| Median | 16.3% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.0% | 29.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.0% | 15.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 23.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.6% | 23.5% |
Correlation Details
| French Canadian Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 356,807,530 | 17.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 78,473,595 | 14.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 20,857,989 | 15.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 8,956,314 | 15.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 5,187,310 | 14.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 3,076,052 | 15.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 2,442,393 | 15.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 1,861,204 | 13.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 1,364,591 | 15.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.75% | 1,103,619 | 16.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.26% | 865,809 | 16.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 661,021 | 15.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.23% | 788,144 | 14.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 583,451 | 13.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.21% | 668,356 | 13.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.73% | 438,697 | 15.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 712,136 | 14.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.76% | 208,926 | 15.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.26% | 280,441 | 21.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.67% | 197,237 | 15.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.30% | 308,988 | 17.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 254,453 | 20.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.26% | 108,544 | 17.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.77% | 57,594 | 15.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.28% | 114,322 | 13.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.73% | 228,876 | 27.6% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.16% | 35,327 | 11.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.76% | 22,935 | 13.0% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.24% | 88,094 | 21.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.73% | 59,566 | 21.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.10% | 16,924 | 10.4% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.76% | 55,443 | 21.5% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.27% | 36,094 | 9.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.63% | 28,181 | 17.1% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.11% | 50,131 | 9.1% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.71% | 8,379 | 14.5% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.26% | 18,600 | 26.5% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.95% | 89,161 | 27.3% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.29% | 23,500 | 17.1% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.64% | 392 | 52.4% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.33% | 11,490 | 14.4% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.79% | 7,324 | 17.7% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.41% | 3,988 | 27.3% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.87% | 2,154 | 2.6% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.83% | 1,323 | 30.2% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.34% | 1,474 | 40.3% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.71% | 561 | 100.0% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.37% | 6,425 | 11.2% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.73% | 241 | 58.2% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.24% | 2,043 | 34.9% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 49 | 100.0% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.82% | 1,668 | 40.1% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.59% | 419 | 51.4% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.21% | 298 | 43.8% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.98% | 3,190 | 39.5% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.11% | 131 | 100.0% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.66% | 2,883 | 65.0% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.47% | 340 | 51.4% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.61% | 101 | 100.0% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.32% | 1,442 | 6.6% |
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.70% | 576 | 74.8% |
[ 55.0% - 55.5% ] 55.41% | 915 | 29.2% |
[ 57.0% - 57.5% ] 57.15% | 1,398 | 29.2% |
[ 58.0% - 58.5% ] 58.09% | 346 | 9.1% |
[ 60.5% - 61.0% ] 60.58% | 728 | 8.7% |