Iranian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Iranian
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Iranian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
12.4%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 311,679,854 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060 and weighted average of 12.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iranians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Iranians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Iranians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Iranians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Iranians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 0.43%), Chinese (12.3%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 0.66%), Immigrants from Iran (12.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants from India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants from Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants from Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants from Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants from South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants from Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Iranian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iranian Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.097% | 0.88% |
| Maximum | 36.4% | 18.0% |
| Range | 36.3% | 17.1% |
| Mean | 9.0% | 8.2% |
| Median | 5.9% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 4.2% |
Correlation Details
| Iranian Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.097% | 226,651,994 | 18.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 44,541,580 | 13.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.63% | 16,419,713 | 10.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 7,047,302 | 8.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 4,158,511 | 7.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 6,141,177 | 17.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.69% | 1,760,693 | 6.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 861,440 | 7.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 678,238 | 10.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 513,333 | 11.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.79% | 533,440 | 5.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.95% | 234,031 | 5.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 253,503 | 8.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 586,597 | 6.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.82% | 245,788 | 4.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.13% | 73,451 | 7.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.28% | 84,133 | 5.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 50,240 | 5.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.77% | 158,864 | 14.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 6,092 | 0.88% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 13,175 | 12.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.54% | 23,987 | 3.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.89% | 82,117 | 3.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.44% | 70,131 | 3.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 69,278 | 5.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.95% | 31,515 | 2.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.27% | 26,318 | 6.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.41% | 51,872 | 8.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 64,485 | 9.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.06% | 50,392 | 5.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.77% | 37,705 | 7.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.92% | 23,106 | 5.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.72% | 9,169 | 9.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.10% | 2,653 | 9.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.98% | 7,868 | 10.1% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.05% | 10,881 | 13.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.47% | 9,699 | 3.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.02% | 11,060 | 13.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.20% | 16,190 | 1.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.51% | 32,406 | 9.8% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.15% | 19,180 | 6.8% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.85% | 1,207 | 1.9% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.30% | 9,105 | 17.0% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.51% | 642 | 12.2% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.42% | 5,593 | 8.6% |