African Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
African
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
African Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
21.9%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
African Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,760,233 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Africans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.521 and weighted average of 21.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.61% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Africans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Africans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Africans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Africans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Dominica (22.1%, a difference of 0.66%), U.S. Virgin Islander (22.1%, a difference of 0.82%), and Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.87%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants from Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants from Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants from Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
African Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | African Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 68.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 68.4% | 98.3% |
| Mean | 18.6% | 33.9% |
| Median | 14.5% | 31.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 23.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.4% | 41.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.1% | 18.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.1% | 18.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.0% | 18.6% |
Correlation Details
| African Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 248,890,349 | 15.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 104,588,043 | 19.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 57,857,650 | 22.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 20,827,377 | 22.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 10,491,875 | 23.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.68% | 7,742,543 | 24.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 4,166,879 | 23.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 1,775,538 | 24.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.23% | 1,226,274 | 26.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 1,322,373 | 29.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.26% | 804,237 | 25.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 447,831 | 29.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.31% | 392,229 | 32.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 483,296 | 24.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.25% | 268,086 | 33.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.84% | 186,122 | 36.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.18% | 141,662 | 22.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.70% | 159,408 | 30.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.27% | 163,460 | 28.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.74% | 61,232 | 37.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.22% | 133,132 | 41.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.72% | 226,184 | 18.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.34% | 9,303 | 44.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.63% | 25,371 | 19.8% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.22% | 9,433 | 65.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.93% | 23,227 | 33.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 4,891 | 54.5% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.66% | 4,553 | 52.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.17% | 15,888 | 24.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.77% | 103,882 | 28.2% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.29% | 21,887 | 41.7% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.74% | 7,403 | 35.5% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 5,909 | 13.2% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.20% | 16,776 | 21.0% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.74% | 2,672 | 25.3% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.06% | 40,302 | 34.6% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.74% | 19,765 | 33.9% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.77% | 10,350 | 39.4% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.25% | 2,929 | 54.4% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.81% | 2,849 | 36.8% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.32% | 15,443 | 32.7% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.71% | 6,846 | 25.8% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.79% | 8,656 | 46.4% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.38% | 24,795 | 38.0% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.91% | 273 | 33.3% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.20% | 512 | 18.8% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.24% | 2,138 | 42.0% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.36% | 606 | 3.3% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.35% | 2,485 | 5.9% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.01% | 1,476 | 1.7% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.23% | 1,286 | 8.5% |
[ 40.0% - 40.5% ] 40.41% | 9,613 | 51.7% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.76% | 613 | 69.4% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.29% | 633 | 45.3% |
[ 58.0% - 58.5% ] 58.19% | 574 | 47.9% |
[ 59.0% - 59.5% ] 59.02% | 549 | 100.0% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.55% | 479 | 46.1% |
[ 68.5% - 69.0% ] 68.60% | 86 | 100.0% |