Inupiat Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Inupiat
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Inupiat Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
20.8%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,999,141 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.205 and weighted average of 20.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Inupiat within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.10% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Inupiat and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Inupiat influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Inupiat simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from West Indies (20.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Caribbean (20.7%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Senegal (20.7%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Grenada (20.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Mexican (20.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants from Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 20.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants from Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants from Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants from Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants from Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants from West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Inupiat Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Inupiat Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.028% | 5.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 65.5% |
Range | 100.0% | 60.5% |
Mean | 52.9% | 30.6% |
Median | 62.5% | 23.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 15.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 90.5% | 46.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 84.1% | 31.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 38.7% | 18.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 38.3% | 18.7% |
Correlation Details
Inupiat Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 94,428,750 | 19.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 415,457 | 15.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 302,961 | 17.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.64% | 91,113 | 10.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 451,197 | 13.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 164,447 | 18.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 19,796 | 17.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 58,519 | 12.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.34% | 4,745 | 34.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 2,159 | 15.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.06% | 7,328 | 19.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.11% | 2,062 | 44.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 90 | 55.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.84% | 587 | 18.5% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.23% | 616 | 12.5% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.76% | 1,640 | 46.6% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.47% | 843 | 65.5% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.26% | 95 | 50.0% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.16% | 692 | 65.5% |
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.06% | 51 | 50.0% |
[ 52.0% - 52.5% ] 52.38% | 9,755 | 15.3% |
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.38% | 752 | 20.0% |
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.68% | 4,453 | 6.7% |
[ 58.0% - 58.5% ] 58.36% | 4,150 | 5.0% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.61% | 3,255 | 21.8% |
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.59% | 3,088 | 21.8% |
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.11% | 1,128 | 9.0% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.68% | 1,242 | 5.3% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.28% | 444 | 64.1% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.68% | 630 | 23.9% |
[ 82.5% - 83.0% ] 82.67% | 554 | 48.6% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.88% | 344 | 45.5% |
[ 85.0% - 85.5% ] 85.30% | 558 | 50.0% |
[ 87.5% - 88.0% ] 87.79% | 1,114 | 64.0% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.30% | 1,308 | 23.4% |
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.95% | 378 | 12.8% |
[ 91.0% - 91.5% ] 91.10% | 1,686 | 26.2% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.91% | 846 | 40.0% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.23% | 266 | 47.1% |
[ 93.5% - 94.0% ] 93.57% | 809 | 8.1% |
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.31% | 1,652 | 64.7% |
[ 94.5% - 95.0% ] 94.72% | 1,136 | 43.2% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.96% | 1,288 | 23.8% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.08% | 1,072 | 7.8% |
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.60% | 588 | 39.6% |
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.19% | 2,138 | 33.5% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.30% | 824 | 45.7% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 535 | 48.1% |