Immigrants from Western Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Africa
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants from Western Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
19.7%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
61.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 347,504,822 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Africa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 19.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.24% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Western Africa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Western Africa influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Immigrants from Western Africa simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Africa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Africa are Mexican American Indian (19.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Liberian (19.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Potawatomi (19.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Cuba (19.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (19.6%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 62.2 /100 | #250 | Good 19.5% |
Immigrants from Ghana | 61.9 /100 | #251 | Good 19.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 61.9 /100 | #252 | Good 19.6% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa | 61.6 /100 | #253 | Good 19.6% |
Immigrants from Cuba | 61.6 /100 | #254 | Good 19.6% |
Potawatomi | 61.5 /100 | #255 | Good 19.7% |
Mexican American Indians | 61.3 /100 | #256 | Good 19.7% |
Immigrants from Western Africa | 61.2 /100 | #257 | Good 19.7% |
Liberians | 61.0 /100 | #258 | Good 19.7% |
Shoshone | 60.9 /100 | #259 | Good 19.8% |
Ottawa | 60.8 /100 | #260 | Good 19.8% |
Salvadorans | 60.4 /100 | #261 | Good 19.9% |
Jamaicans | 60.1 /100 | #262 | Good 20.0% |
Immigrants from Jamaica | 59.5 /100 | #263 | Average 20.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 59.4 /100 | #264 | Average 20.1% |
Immigrants from Western Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Western Africa Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.10% | 7.8% |
Maximum | 19.1% | 42.6% |
Range | 19.0% | 34.9% |
Mean | 6.3% | 21.5% |
Median | 5.9% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 26.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 6.6% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Western Africa Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 192,337,677 | 17.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 60,942,082 | 17.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 30,659,073 | 18.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 19,246,845 | 20.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.07% | 17,242,941 | 20.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 5,198,887 | 17.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 4,812,842 | 18.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 3,842,955 | 19.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 1,760,574 | 20.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 1,464,357 | 17.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 1,653,201 | 21.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.80% | 838,134 | 20.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 576,423 | 28.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.32% | 671,493 | 19.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 492,022 | 25.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 770,402 | 20.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.03% | 364,249 | 18.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.26% | 633,699 | 26.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 595,922 | 26.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 370,438 | 17.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.01% | 248,423 | 25.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.24% | 196,331 | 20.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.50% | 79,265 | 22.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.76% | 368,795 | 21.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.06% | 78,658 | 18.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.19% | 143,486 | 27.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.48% | 164,300 | 23.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 160,333 | 32.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.99% | 75,513 | 18.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.29% | 84,901 | 18.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.46% | 171,504 | 18.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.79% | 155,255 | 30.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.97% | 129,450 | 28.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.20% | 68,364 | 25.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.39% | 123,745 | 32.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.68% | 170,783 | 10.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.37% | 106,976 | 29.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.68% | 51,700 | 14.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.01% | 85,247 | 9.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.34% | 33,120 | 7.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.91% | 29,071 | 11.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.10% | 12,722 | 27.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.34% | 35,645 | 15.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.69% | 51,278 | 26.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.49% | 104,216 | 15.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.08% | 68,571 | 14.9% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.54% | 29,993 | 42.6% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.15% | 2,961 | 30.5% |