Immigrants from Laos Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants from Laos Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
18.9%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Laos Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,827,188 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191 and weighted average of 18.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.70% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Laos and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Laos influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Immigrants from Laos simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Laos by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Shoshone (18.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Ecuadorian (18.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (18.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Ghana (18.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Cuba (18.8%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants from Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Immigrants from Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Immigrants from Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants from Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants from Guyana | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants from Laos Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Laos Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 16.5% | 60.0% |
| Range | 16.5% | 59.0% |
| Mean | 3.6% | 22.2% |
| Median | 2.8% | 20.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 26.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 11.3% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Laos Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 129,591,729 | 17.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 29,816,238 | 15.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 14,607,044 | 15.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 7,063,810 | 15.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 4,101,079 | 19.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 2,683,635 | 16.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 2,677,571 | 18.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 1,222,517 | 20.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 1,251,847 | 15.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 803,361 | 15.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 449,931 | 17.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 1,173,503 | 17.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 515,381 | 26.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.29% | 364,616 | 19.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 1,104,413 | 26.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.51% | 102,603 | 27.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.58% | 100,924 | 16.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 175,965 | 36.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.78% | 183,220 | 22.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 136,113 | 24.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 262,666 | 17.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 65,407 | 22.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 66,887 | 17.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 66,955 | 31.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 71,859 | 25.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 69,767 | 27.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 56,397 | 36.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.64% | 337,411 | 26.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 56,927 | 20.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 76,140 | 27.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 6,326 | 26.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 32,651 | 31.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 32 | 20.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 92,651 | 23.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.28% | 3,841 | 10.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.45% | 9,310 | 30.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.49% | 2,433 | 20.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.60% | 70,364 | 34.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 41,405 | 18.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.99% | 146,187 | 12.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 34,220 | 14.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.55% | 14,787 | 3.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.69% | 2,984 | 20.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 1,003 | 46.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 5,134 | 15.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.47% | 17,716 | 3.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.66% | 106 | 60.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.06% | 57,662 | 30.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 991 | 10.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 3,208 | 2.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 19,613 | 46.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.74% | 1,900 | 24.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 153 | 5.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.11% | 2,207 | 1.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 216 | 26.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.80% | 1,693 | 15.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.93% | 1,218 | 26.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.57% | 527 | 17.6% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.49% | 734 | 54.5% |