Armenian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Armenian
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Armenian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
15.5%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
87.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,744,941 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080 and weighted average of 15.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Armenians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Armenians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Armenians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Armenians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Armenians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Vietnam (15.5%, a difference of 0.10%), New Zealander (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Jordan (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Canadian (15.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and South African (15.5%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Immigrants from Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
| South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
| New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Armenian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Armenian Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.097% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 43.5% | 32.7% |
| Range | 43.4% | 30.1% |
| Mean | 14.0% | 13.8% |
| Median | 8.5% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.8% | 16.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.9% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.9% | 7.3% |
Correlation Details
| Armenian Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.097% | 266,869,183 | 16.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49% | 22,184,955 | 11.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 4,846,597 | 10.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.24% | 2,529,218 | 16.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 740,983 | 11.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 4,794,998 | 20.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 493,721 | 14.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.68% | 477,855 | 14.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.13% | 108,822 | 14.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 241,537 | 24.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.90% | 16,588 | 6.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 59,720 | 10.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.45% | 107,867 | 6.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.87% | 29,887 | 7.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.23% | 85,743 | 20.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.45% | 108,092 | 10.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 88,797 | 7.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.80% | 60,345 | 30.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.86% | 42,719 | 9.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 20,092 | 6.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 4,982 | 32.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.54% | 72,421 | 11.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.76% | 145,227 | 10.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.41% | 43,552 | 23.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.62% | 51,654 | 24.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.69% | 32,344 | 4.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.08% | 650 | 15.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.41% | 27,479 | 7.6% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.85% | 2,038 | 7.7% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 20,911 | 2.6% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.46% | 8,209 | 11.5% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.65% | 12,312 | 3.4% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 45,564 | 15.7% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.98% | 15,377 | 2.9% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.43% | 226 | 8.5% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.71% | 18,951 | 13.1% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.78% | 16,679 | 26.1% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.51% | 194,512 | 16.7% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.93% | 32,294 | 16.5% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.12% | 35,755 | 27.6% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.33% | 11,091 | 8.8% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.51% | 22,831 | 16.6% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.52% | 22,163 | 17.3% |