Immigrants from Canada Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Canada
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants from Canada Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
14.8%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Canada Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,973,895 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600 and weighted average of 14.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.8% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Canada and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Canada influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Immigrants from Canada simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Canada by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Northern European (14.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Belarus (14.8%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants from Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants from Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants from Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants from North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants from Switzerland | 96.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Germans | 96.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants from Canada Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Canada Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.19% | 11.2% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 33.1% | 88.8% |
Mean | 9.3% | 44.8% |
Median | 8.2% | 34.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 16.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 69.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 53.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 33.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 32.8% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Canada Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 371,107,905 | 17.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 57,488,425 | 11.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 12,274,208 | 11.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.69% | 3,827,378 | 11.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 1,238,092 | 14.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 491,999 | 16.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 160,495 | 14.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 84,579 | 24.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.10% | 132,295 | 16.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.72% | 42,483 | 17.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 27,506 | 12.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.81% | 3,630 | 73.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.13% | 27,014 | 22.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.76% | 10,895 | 34.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 21,169 | 19.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.58% | 2,519 | 65.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.23% | 243 | 40.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.82% | 3,867 | 37.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 6,663 | 43.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.56% | 1,151 | 25.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.05% | 1,820 | 43.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.89% | 716 | 100.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.32% | 53 | 100.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.87% | 4,935 | 29.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.18% | 2,726 | 63.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.98% | 131 | 100.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.30% | 188 | 100.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.65% | 147 | 100.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.59% | 4,297 | 49.6% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.29% | 133 | 100.0% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.74% | 3,669 | 47.9% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.26% | 2,498 | 15.0% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 66 | 100.0% |