Shoshone Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Shoshone
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Shoshone Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
18.9%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,320,610 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.556 and weighted average of 18.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.29% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Shoshone and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Shoshone influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Shoshone simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Shoshone by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Laos (18.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Ecuadorian (18.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (18.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Ghana (18.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Cuba (18.8%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants from Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants from Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Immigrants from Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Immigrants from Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants from Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.2% |
Shoshone Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Shoshone Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.024% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 81.5% | 50.0% |
| Range | 81.5% | 47.5% |
| Mean | 14.2% | 21.8% |
| Median | 5.6% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 29.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.5% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.1% | 10.8% |
Correlation Details
| Shoshone Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.024% | 65,150,852 | 19.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 651,895 | 16.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76% | 264,093 | 16.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.07% | 57,976 | 13.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 75,392 | 14.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 9,508 | 18.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 1,246 | 2.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.38% | 28,250 | 14.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 1,690 | 8.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 11,807 | 18.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 28,568 | 19.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.61% | 1,107 | 6.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.86% | 363 | 42.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 1,109 | 17.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.17% | 2,690 | 22.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.59% | 894 | 29.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.96% | 7,212 | 11.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.21% | 290 | 30.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 13,989 | 11.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 802 | 10.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.50% | 240 | 41.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.51% | 2,608 | 26.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.83% | 2,265 | 17.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.83% | 1,471 | 18.9% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.05% | 304 | 25.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.08% | 78 | 36.4% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.78% | 174 | 33.3% |
[ 42.0% - 42.5% ] 42.11% | 513 | 27.3% |
[ 63.5% - 64.0% ] 63.88% | 1,481 | 29.0% |
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.00% | 1,597 | 25.7% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.51% | 146 | 50.0% |