Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Select to Compare
Family Households
Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Households
61.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,657,833 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060 and weighted average of 61.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.096% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Middle Africa influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Immigrants from Middle Africa simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (61.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (61.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Alaskan Athabascan (61.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Liberian (62.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants from Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants from Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants from Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants from Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa Data | Family Households Data |
Minimum | 0.047% | 38.1% |
Maximum | 25.6% | 80.2% |
Range | 25.6% | 42.1% |
Mean | 4.3% | 63.6% |
Median | 3.0% | 62.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 60.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 68.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 7.5% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Middle Africa Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.047% | 132,025,251 | 62.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 33,277,602 | 61.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 15,092,198 | 61.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 7,461,029 | 60.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 4,568,995 | 62.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 2,671,285 | 63.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 1,571,316 | 62.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 959,157 | 62.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 946,046 | 60.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 887,361 | 66.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 620,695 | 56.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 280,199 | 58.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 227,605 | 59.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 294,666 | 57.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.86% | 294,753 | 65.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 178,803 | 61.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 122,311 | 60.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 153,287 | 53.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 199,553 | 56.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 127,033 | 66.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 12,365 | 62.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 10,210 | 72.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 105,607 | 70.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.02% | 49,856 | 67.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 20,174 | 74.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 3,648 | 68.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.40% | 43,554 | 59.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.54% | 125,905 | 64.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.69% | 2,330 | 47.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 12,128 | 65.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.17% | 69,634 | 54.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 76,357 | 69.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.46% | 28,427 | 62.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 17,634 | 64.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.75% | 27,909 | 62.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.89% | 26,684 | 74.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.66% | 21,985 | 63.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 2,699 | 80.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.84% | 14,443 | 59.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.92% | 3,104 | 75.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.99% | 15,489 | 63.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.96% | 4,809 | 70.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.47% | 1,997 | 76.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.61% | 422 | 68.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.52% | 1,240 | 71.0% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.64% | 78 | 38.1% |