Immigrants from China vs Northern European Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 396,909,088 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 10.4%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from China	Northern European
Minimum	1.1%	7.8%
Maximum	24.4%	62.9%
Range	23.3%	55.1%
Mean	12.0%	24.2%
Median	11.4%	19.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.6%	12.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	14.0%	32.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.4%	19.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.7%	15.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.7%	15.4%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%

Demographics Similar to Northern Europeans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Northern Europeans are Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Italy	97.4 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 14.8%
Soviet Union	97.3 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 14.8%
Swiss	97.2 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 14.8%
Australians	97.2 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 14.8%
Finns	97.2 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 14.8%
Immigrants \| Canada	97.1 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 14.8%
Jordanians	97.1 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 14.8%
Northern Europeans	97.0 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 14.8%
Immigrants \| Belarus	97.0 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 14.8%
Austrians	96.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| North America	96.6 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	96.3 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 14.9%
Germans	96.3 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| France	96.2 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Latvia	96.1 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 14.9%