Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Mexico Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 501,744,550 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 61.1%.

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Somalia (21.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and Bahamian (21.5%, a difference of 0.56%).