Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Guatemala Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 372,986,331 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.562 and weighted average of 21.9%, a difference of 62.9%.

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.27%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.55%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and Immigrants from Dominica (22.1%, a difference of 0.99%).