Immigrants from China vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 110.3%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from China	Pima
Minimum	1.1%	11.0%
Maximum	24.4%	100.0%
Range	23.3%	89.0%
Mean	12.0%	41.2%
Median	11.4%	34.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.6%	21.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	14.0%	57.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.4%	36.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.7%	25.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.7%	25.1%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%

Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Blacks/African Americans	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 24.7%
Menominee	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 25.0%
Pueblo	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 25.2%
Sioux	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 25.6%
Yup'ik	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 25.8%
Cheyenne	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 26.3%
Crow	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 26.4%
Yuman	0.0 /100 \| #340	Tragic 27.1%
Hopi	0.0 /100 \| #341	Tragic 27.9%
Pima	0.0 /100 \| #342	Tragic 28.2%
Immigrants \| Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #343	Tragic 29.5%
Navajo	0.0 /100 \| #344	Tragic 30.5%
Lumbee	0.0 /100 \| #345	Tragic 30.7%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #346	Tragic 31.6%
Puerto Ricans	0.0 /100 \| #347	Tragic 32.7%