Czechoslovakian In Labor Force | Age 45-54
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Czechoslovakian In Labor Force | Age 45-54
83.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
74.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,521,801 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 83.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.061% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Czechoslovakians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Czechoslovakians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 within an area, or if Czechoslovakians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In terms of in labor force | age 45-54, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Romanian (83.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from France (83.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nigeria (83.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Soviet Union (83.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Sweden (82.9%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 |
| Yugoslavians | 78.3 /100 | #140 | Good 83.0% |
| Immigrants from Haiti | 77.9 /100 | #141 | Good 83.0% |
| Immigrants from Scotland | 77.8 /100 | #142 | Good 83.0% |
| Okinawans | 77.0 /100 | #143 | Good 83.0% |
| Soviet Union | 76.8 /100 | #144 | Good 83.0% |
| Romanians | 75.4 /100 | #145 | Good 83.0% |
| Immigrants from France | 75.3 /100 | #146 | Good 83.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 83.0% |
| Immigrants from Nigeria | 74.1 /100 | #148 | Good 83.0% |
| Immigrants from Sweden | 73.3 /100 | #149 | Good 82.9% |
| Immigrants from Netherlands | 72.6 /100 | #150 | Good 82.9% |
| Koreans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 82.9% |
| Slavs | 71.5 /100 | #152 | Good 82.9% |
| Immigrants from Indonesia | 70.6 /100 | #153 | Good 82.9% |
| Immigrants from Ghana | 70.3 /100 | #154 | Good 82.9% |
Czechoslovakian In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian Data | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Data |
| Minimum | 0.078% | 48.9% |
| Maximum | 35.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 35.4% | 51.1% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 84.2% |
| Median | 7.3% | 84.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 76.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 94.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 17.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 12.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 12.1% |
Correlation Details
| Czechoslovakian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.078% | 329,677,635 | 82.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 28,349,202 | 84.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 6,519,701 | 83.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 2,024,121 | 84.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 724,675 | 83.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 489,441 | 81.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 253,089 | 82.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 133,841 | 81.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 50,223 | 84.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 39,264 | 83.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 54,352 | 85.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 32,516 | 81.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 23,270 | 85.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.41% | 29,044 | 86.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 22,993 | 88.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.94% | 12,274 | 80.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 14,705 | 75.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 10,822 | 66.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.66% | 3,714 | 83.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 4,644 | 90.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 6,798 | 90.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 4,061 | 85.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 3,609 | 69.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 1,917 | 69.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.14% | 586 | 73.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.43% | 3,157 | 84.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 5,956 | 89.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79% | 1,722 | 74.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 211 | 100.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.33% | 191 | 100.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.84% | 4,045 | 94.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.20% | 561 | 74.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.48% | 2,075 | 66.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.52% | 223 | 100.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.76% | 605 | 75.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.09% | 22 | 100.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.74% | 154 | 100.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.78% | 1,544 | 84.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.08% | 1,418 | 100.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.50% | 1,810 | 89.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.55% | 417 | 100.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.92% | 952 | 49.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.43% | 1,452 | 88.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.86% | 2,175 | 99.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.77% | 376 | 60.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.50% | 526 | 82.4% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.64% | 110 | 100.0% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.29% | 588 | 94.9% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.59% | 1,775 | 87.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.25% | 59 | 100.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.69% | 102 | 100.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.56% | 151 | 48.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.92% | 591 | 83.6% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.09% | 515 | 76.5% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.45% | 489 | 100.0% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.57% | 504 | 83.8% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.77% | 468 | 65.6% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.42% | 219 | 76.9% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.46% | 141 | 100.0% |