Czechoslovakian In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Czechoslovakian In Labor Force | Age 35-44
84.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
82.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,545,873 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 84.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.31% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Czechoslovakians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Czechoslovakians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 within an area, or if Czechoslovakians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Zaire (84.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Japan (84.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (84.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belgium (84.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (84.6%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
| Immigrants from Scotland | 89.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 84.7% |
| Austrians | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 84.7% |
| Argentineans | 88.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Immigrants from Korea | 88.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Immigrants from Malaysia | 87.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Afghans | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Immigrants from Chile | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Czechoslovakians | 82.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Immigrants from Zaire | 82.5 /100 | #139 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Immigrants from Japan | 81.4 /100 | #140 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Immigrants from Belgium | 80.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Immigrants from Uruguay | 80.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 84.6% |
| Immigrants from Ukraine | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 84.6% |
| Immigrants from Jamaica | 79.4 /100 | #144 | Good 84.6% |
| Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | 79.4 /100 | #145 | Good 84.6% |
Czechoslovakian In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian Data | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Data |
| Minimum | 0.078% | 55.5% |
| Maximum | 35.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 35.4% | 44.5% |
| Mean | 7.7% | 85.2% |
| Median | 6.7% | 85.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 80.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.3% | 93.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 12.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 10.6% |
Correlation Details
| Czechoslovakian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.078% | 329,697,240 | 84.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 28,360,836 | 85.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 6,520,626 | 85.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 2,019,473 | 85.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 725,111 | 85.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 488,793 | 82.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 253,378 | 85.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 132,591 | 86.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 49,296 | 85.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 39,477 | 87.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 53,482 | 87.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 34,517 | 78.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 22,963 | 85.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.41% | 28,569 | 89.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 22,446 | 86.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 12,327 | 86.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 14,705 | 83.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 11,332 | 85.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.66% | 3,714 | 79.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 4,644 | 72.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.17% | 6,522 | 89.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 4,061 | 94.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 3,609 | 93.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.80% | 1,396 | 98.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.14% | 586 | 96.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.43% | 3,746 | 85.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 6,197 | 90.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79% | 1,722 | 84.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 211 | 60.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.35% | 136 | 80.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 52 | 76.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.83% | 4,059 | 75.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 340 | 94.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.48% | 2,075 | 75.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.76% | 605 | 71.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.09% | 22 | 100.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.35% | 278 | 100.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.74% | 154 | 100.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.78% | 1,544 | 55.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.08% | 1,418 | 92.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.50% | 1,810 | 60.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.92% | 952 | 60.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.43% | 1,531 | 98.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.86% | 2,175 | 81.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.77% | 376 | 93.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.50% | 526 | 66.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.29% | 588 | 88.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.59% | 1,775 | 88.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.56% | 151 | 100.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.92% | 591 | 95.1% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.09% | 515 | 86.8% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.45% | 489 | 94.8% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.46% | 141 | 100.0% |