Czechoslovakian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Czechoslovakian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
9.5%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 65
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,521,017 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.087% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 65.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Czechoslovakians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 within an area, or if Czechoslovakians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Latvian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (9.4%, a difference of 0.43%), Scotch-Irish (9.5%, a difference of 0.50%), Belgian (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Native Hawaiian (9.4%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Finns | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Belgians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants from North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Czechoslovakian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Data |
| Minimum | 0.078% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 35.5% | 44.2% |
| Range | 35.4% | 43.1% |
| Mean | 7.7% | 11.8% |
| Median | 5.7% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 8.1% |
Correlation Details
| Czechoslovakian Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.078% | 329,214,571 | 10.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 28,069,385 | 7.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 6,425,858 | 8.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 1,981,938 | 8.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 697,243 | 7.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 461,989 | 9.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 237,124 | 7.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 126,008 | 10.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 43,826 | 8.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 36,446 | 14.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 51,916 | 10.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 30,823 | 11.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 18,472 | 11.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.41% | 27,061 | 6.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 20,288 | 9.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.94% | 11,312 | 10.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 12,564 | 10.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 9,633 | 15.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.66% | 3,284 | 8.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 3,146 | 7.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.17% | 6,483 | 14.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.29% | 2,343 | 22.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.64% | 2,980 | 7.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.80% | 1,984 | 14.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.14% | 586 | 22.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.43% | 3,126 | 12.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 5,713 | 7.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79% | 1,722 | 18.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 52 | 6.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 340 | 9.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.48% | 2,075 | 18.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.74% | 154 | 25.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75% | 810 | 10.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.10% | 1,000 | 2.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.50% | 1,810 | 3.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.90% | 688 | 7.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.43% | 1,452 | 7.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.86% | 2,108 | 1.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.77% | 376 | 27.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.50% | 526 | 7.6% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.64% | 110 | 13.9% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.56% | 666 | 32.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.56% | 151 | 44.2% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.09% | 515 | 1.1% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.42% | 219 | 12.2% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.46% | 141 | 1.1% |