Czechoslovakian In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Czechoslovakian In Labor Force | Age 20-64
79.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
44.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,672,704 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.033 and weighted average of 79.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.040% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Czechoslovakians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Czechoslovakians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Czechoslovakians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Cuban (79.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Australian (79.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Netherlands (79.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Armenian (79.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and Salvadoran (79.5%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Immigrants from Switzerland | 53.3 /100 | #171 | Average 79.6% |
| Immigrants from Belgium | 53.1 /100 | #172 | Average 79.6% |
| Immigrants from Scotland | 52.4 /100 | #173 | Average 79.6% |
| Syrians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 79.6% |
| Cubans | 46.1 /100 | #175 | Average 79.5% |
| Australians | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 79.5% |
| Immigrants from Netherlands | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 79.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 44.3 /100 | #178 | Average 79.5% |
| Armenians | 41.4 /100 | #179 | Average 79.5% |
| Salvadorans | 41.0 /100 | #180 | Average 79.5% |
| Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | 37.7 /100 | #181 | Fair 79.5% |
| Malaysians | 37.1 /100 | #182 | Fair 79.5% |
| Immigrants from Hungary | 36.8 /100 | #183 | Fair 79.5% |
| Finns | 35.9 /100 | #184 | Fair 79.5% |
| Israelis | 34.7 /100 | #185 | Fair 79.5% |
Czechoslovakian In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
| Minimum | 0.078% | 41.7% |
| Maximum | 43.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 43.6% | 58.3% |
| Mean | 10.5% | 75.8% |
| Median | 8.2% | 77.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 72.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 80.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 11.3% |
Correlation Details
| Czechoslovakian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.078% | 329,757,396 | 79.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 28,380,116 | 80.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 6,543,779 | 80.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 2,025,473 | 80.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 729,978 | 79.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 489,599 | 77.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 253,560 | 79.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 135,902 | 80.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 51,331 | 80.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 39,856 | 76.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 54,545 | 80.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 34,585 | 69.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 23,303 | 80.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.41% | 29,044 | 76.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 23,021 | 83.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 12,327 | 76.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 14,705 | 73.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 11,332 | 73.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.66% | 3,714 | 68.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 4,644 | 79.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 6,916 | 83.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 4,061 | 87.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.63% | 3,768 | 73.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.80% | 1,984 | 72.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.14% | 586 | 79.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.43% | 3,872 | 71.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 6,197 | 78.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79% | 1,722 | 81.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 211 | 64.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.33% | 191 | 83.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 52 | 79.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.83% | 4,174 | 83.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.20% | 561 | 76.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.48% | 2,075 | 68.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.52% | 223 | 100.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.76% | 605 | 75.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.09% | 22 | 75.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.35% | 278 | 42.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.74% | 154 | 74.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.78% | 1,544 | 58.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.08% | 1,418 | 58.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.50% | 1,810 | 80.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.55% | 417 | 75.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.92% | 952 | 63.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.43% | 1,531 | 76.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.86% | 2,175 | 82.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.77% | 376 | 54.5% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.50% | 526 | 78.8% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.66% | 161 | 81.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.29% | 588 | 84.9% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.59% | 1,775 | 74.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.25% | 59 | 53.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.69% | 102 | 73.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.56% | 151 | 62.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.92% | 591 | 89.6% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.09% | 515 | 77.4% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.45% | 489 | 97.3% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.28% | 116 | 69.2% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.00% | 8 | 100.0% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.57% | 504 | 68.8% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.89% | 87 | 41.7% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.77% | 468 | 56.5% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.42% | 219 | 72.5% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.46% | 141 | 87.2% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.70% | 119 | 100.0% |