Czechoslovakian vs Soviet Union Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Soviet Union
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Soviet Union
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Soviet Union Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,467,863 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,449,399 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 1.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Soviet Union |
| Minimum | 0.52% | 0.56% |
| Maximum | 32.3% | 26.3% |
| Range | 31.8% | 25.7% |
| Mean | 13.5% | 9.6% |
| Median | 12.3% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Soviet Union by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and British (12.5%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Laotian (12.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |