Czechoslovakian vs Belgian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Belgian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Belgians
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Belgian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,467,863 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,775,724 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Belgians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.445 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.010%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Belgian |
| Minimum | 0.52% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 32.3% | 25.9% |
| Range | 31.8% | 23.0% |
| Mean | 13.5% | 10.1% |
| Median | 12.3% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Belgians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%), English (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Belgians are Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.21%), English (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |