Czechoslovakian vs English Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
English
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
English
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs English Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,467,863 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,145,061 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.24%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | English |
Minimum | 0.52% | 0.38% |
Maximum | 32.3% | 72.5% |
Range | 31.8% | 72.2% |
Mean | 13.5% | 17.3% |
Median | 12.3% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 19.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and English by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to English are Finnish (12.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Okinawan (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Dutch (12.4%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |