Czechoslovakian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Select to Compare
Male Poverty
Czechoslovakian Male Poverty
10.3%
POVERTY | MALES
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,409,681 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247 and weighted average of 10.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.29% in poverty level among males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Czechoslovakians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among males within an area, or if Czechoslovakians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from England (10.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Belgian (10.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Egyptian (10.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants from Belgium | 96.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Irish | 96.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants from North America | 96.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.3% |
English | 96.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Belgians | 95.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Egyptians | 95.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants from Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants from England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants from Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants from Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Czechoslovakian Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian Data | Male Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.078% | 0.22% |
Maximum | 32.4% | 37.0% |
Range | 32.3% | 36.8% |
Mean | 7.8% | 12.4% |
Median | 6.3% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 16.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 7.4% |
Correlation Details
Czechoslovakian Percentile | Sample Size | Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.078% | 329,645,156 | 11.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 28,333,200 | 8.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 6,507,466 | 8.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 2,016,462 | 8.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 716,447 | 8.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 479,681 | 10.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 248,885 | 8.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 132,340 | 7.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 42,930 | 9.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 39,311 | 11.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 52,812 | 8.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 33,324 | 13.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 22,173 | 7.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.41% | 27,803 | 6.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 22,393 | 7.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.94% | 11,788 | 12.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 14,016 | 14.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 10,185 | 18.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.67% | 3,150 | 12.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 4,563 | 14.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 6,916 | 7.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 3,785 | 8.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.64% | 3,282 | 11.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 1,917 | 20.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.14% | 586 | 12.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.43% | 3,577 | 15.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 5,864 | 3.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79% | 1,722 | 20.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 211 | 20.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 109 | 20.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.82% | 3,786 | 2.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 340 | 2.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.48% | 1,886 | 17.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.74% | 154 | 17.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.78% | 1,544 | 6.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.10% | 1,000 | 14.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.50% | 1,810 | 0.22% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.90% | 688 | 16.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.43% | 1,452 | 10.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.77% | 376 | 10.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.50% | 526 | 16.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.73% | 51 | 33.3% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.29% | 588 | 28.9% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.59% | 1,775 | 17.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.25% | 59 | 8.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.56% | 151 | 37.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.92% | 591 | 0.60% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.09% | 515 | 0.93% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.28% | 116 | 14.0% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.42% | 219 | 15.5% |