Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Africa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Immigrants from South Africa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Immigrants from South Africa
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Africa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,467,863 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,245,302 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 0.24%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from South Africa |
| Minimum | 0.52% | 0.91% |
| Maximum | 32.3% | 44.9% |
| Range | 31.8% | 44.0% |
| Mean | 13.5% | 11.5% |
| Median | 12.3% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Immigrants from South Africa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and English (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |