Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
15.3%
POVERTY | BOYS < 16
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,979,827 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 15.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.38% in poverty level among boys under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Czechoslovakians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 within an area, or if Czechoslovakians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (15.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants from Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants from Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Canadians | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants from Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Mongolians | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants from Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants from Kazakhstan | 88.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian Data | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.078% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 32.4% | 54.7% |
| Range | 32.3% | 51.9% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 24.4% |
| Median | 4.1% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 32.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 19.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 13.1% |
Correlation Details
| Czechoslovakian Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.078% | 325,999,910 | 16.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 26,897,326 | 12.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 5,863,707 | 13.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 1,767,151 | 13.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 612,903 | 14.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 373,743 | 17.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 158,489 | 17.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 110,271 | 10.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 29,317 | 22.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.36% | 23,210 | 18.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 32,994 | 18.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.91% | 24,706 | 30.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 6,252 | 29.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.38% | 10,465 | 12.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 14,894 | 10.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.94% | 10,274 | 23.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 13,945 | 29.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 9,039 | 36.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.68% | 1,326 | 25.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 1,374 | 34.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 5,079 | 11.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 2,426 | 26.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 710 | 53.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.46% | 2,074 | 48.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 211 | 27.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 109 | 38.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.82% | 3,542 | 2.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.48% | 1,886 | 18.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.90% | 688 | 40.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.39% | 395 | 44.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.50% | 526 | 20.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.56% | 666 | 54.7% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.42% | 219 | 10.0% |